Protesters or agitators: Who is driving chaos at L.A. immigration protests?
Orchestrated Riots or Governmental Excesses
THE STRAIGHT ANSWER:
I will begin by endeavoring to explain the obvious in response to the varying responses to the “events” in California. It is an ancient story of biblical proportion combined with Madison Ave Marketing manipulation which reigned during the decades when cigarettes were presented as a cure for whatever ails you, from a deficiency in masculinity (“Marlboro Man”) to a celebration of womanhood. (“you’ve come a long way baby.”) It is as old as primitive man and as fresh as the day’s duplicitous headlines in the New York Times and the deceptive coverage of the Washington Post. Indeed, absent a complicit media’s presentation of alternate realities and false narratives the instigators would be unable to gain traction which would lead to a cessation of hostilities and a return to Constitutionally mandated law enforcement. The dichotomy is manufactured by the press to cause confusion and undermine a coherent immigration policy necessitated by the invasions of illegals during four years of misrule. It is not an affirmation of Kingship, rather it is a denunciation of government without a Chief Executive.
The protests were not spontaneous, but a calculated result of a clearly defined tactic from the Marxist Playbook which conflates a concocted dissatisfaction among an easily manipulated and aimless populace into an intractable controversy. The populace primed with a grievance mentality, reacts with irrational exuberance and unbridled anger to stimuli that lies beneath the conscious threshold. These are Embedded Commands and are an extremely effective as a subliminal persuasion technique. The are tools to activate peaceful protestors who “know not what they do.”
Rioters are opportunistic ideologues who have written the script, directed the action, and produced the mayhem. They are trained agitators and inciters of violence committed to confront law enforcement and propagate violence. They function in two ways” to wreak havoc and destruction directly and to incite programmed bystanders into a tumultuous mob brandishing signs that read, “I stand with the migrants,” and “Fascism must go.”
These glittering generalities are emotionally appealing phrases so loosely associated with virtuous behavior that participants are convinced they “are doing the right thing “and assuming they understand facts and evidence but not that they have been manipulated. It is called Engineered Compliance and is crafted to precipitate action without resort to reasoned argument and sound reasoning. “There is nothing new under the sun.”
THE SPURIOUS QUESTION:
Recent news reports describe protests and clashes with law enforcement in Los Angeles following immigration raids by the federal government.
Some reports suggest that these events have been framed by some as "orchestrated attacks" or "violent, insurrectionist mobs," while others view them as a response to perceived governmental excesses and repression.
It's important to note that different individuals and groups may have varying interpretations of the ideologies driving these events. Some commentators suggest the protests are driven by an "anti-mass deportation movement" or a desire to "rebel against anti-immigrant fascism". Conversely, some conservatives are using social media to depict the events as violent and orchestrated, seemingly to reinforce claims about the dangers of the protests and potentially mobilize support for the federal government's actions. Some even allege that there is a secret plot to impose socialism on the country.
The events in LA highlight the ongoing political polarization and mobilization around immigration policies in the United States.